0

Happythankyoumoreplease

happythankyoumoreplease-01

At least in terms of their ‘relatable’ good looks and the tremendous success of their respective TV comedies, Josh Radnor is undoubtedly the new Zach Braff. Now, six years after Garden State propelled The Shins to their moment of New Slang fame, and 12 months after its acclaimed debut at at the Sundance festival, Radnor is finally releasing his self-penned Happythankyoumoreplease. The message behind its awkwardly phrased and try-hard title is simple: that to live a better life, one must simply be thankful and ask for more. That’s it. As it turns out, it also helps to have gorgeous women fall for you, but hey – no one said life lessons came easy.

Sam Wexler (Radnor) is a 20-something writer, labelled “the voice of a generation”, which is a lot of pressure for a guy who needs help tucking his shirt in. On his way to meet with a publisher, he runs into Rasheen on the subway. The young boy cuts a lonely figure, watching helplessly as his family disappear into the station’s bustling crowd. Being the unassuming sort, Sam decides to help but, for want of any better ideas, ends up dragging the kid along to the meeting. The genial receptionist asks after his name; a younger Wexler sibling, perhaps? “Oh, erm, you… should ask him. He likes to talk”.

Late and otherwise distracted by his inadvertent kidnapping of a minor, the meeting goes as well as it might, which is to say the manuscript merely goes in the bin and not out the window. Afterwards, the pair leave for an Alopecia Awareness Party, because where else do you take a boy who’d be 8 if he knew his own birthday? Annie – totally bald – is Sam’s friend, the guest of honour, and to whom a third of the plot is devoted. Likewise Mary and Charlie, two friends who’ve got hair aplenty. He wants to move across country to set up a business, in a city Mary likens to “the epicentre of all that is awful”. As impossible an impasse that might seem, it proves neatly resolvable with 90 minutes and a pregnancy test. Which is handy.

Of the three stories, the tale of Wexler and Rasheen is by far the most rewarding. I was reminded often of John Cusack’s Martian Child, though many films have explored relating to the arrival of a child and Happythankyoumoreplease does it as well as most. Young Rasheen might be largely mute, but he has these big brown eyes that are expressive all on their own. He draws with dedication bordering on furious, yet never stops looking across at Sam, studying. “You’re my best friend” he says one afternoon, quite nonchalantly. He’s still looking, only this time he’s waiting to hear something back.

The first thing we notice about Mississipi is her red hair, flowing gently in the breeze. She’s a good soul, who adheres firmly to the rule that all women named after states must be southern beauties with fractured charm. Sam chances upon her in a small bar downtown, where he makes up a story of how he came to be in possession of the quizzical young boy by his side. They talk; she thinks he’s sweet. “But I’m a mess, believe me” she goes, a little defensively, as if women named Mississipi can be anything but. Sam looks her dead in the eye and returns a line that almost derails the entire film: “So? Let’s clean each other up”.

Pray tell, dear reader: do images of seedy motels and boxes of baby wipes spring to mind for you too?

The real mistake of Happythankyoumoreplease is dividing its attention. Characters who are little more than outlines of best friends are elevated to the spotlight, in stories that never pay off. Malin Akerman might be brave in taking on the role of bald Annie, but her admirable performance comes in a a segment that is not just preachy, but hopelessly naive in its philosophising on the nature of life, and the eternal struggle to find inner beauty in even the plainest of dinner dates (sorry, Tony Hale).

Of course, much as the film is an extended “Novel is to short-story, as relationship is to…” metaphor, it can also be stubbornly charming. The relationship between Sam and Rasheen is slow-burning and natural, even if we must accept the artifice of kidnap to maintain any degree of plausibility. And in Mississipi Sam’s found not just a belle who’ll help him overcome problems and – you knew it was coming – mature, but cast a fresh spotlight on Kate Mara, who was excellent in the likes of Transsiberian long before sister Rooney has even heard of The Social Network.

Too much of the remainder of the film is a stumbling mess, but then Garden State – the film’s closest relation – had that whole rainy Noah’s arc bit, now long forgotten in favour of more readily recalled moments of triumphant honesty between a boy and a girl. Like that film, Happythankyoumoreplease is neither a C nor a B on our arbitrary four-point rating scale: not bad enough to be ignored, yet too middling on the whole to be eagerly recommended. Perhaps in the absence of an arbiter, I’ll err on the side of exuberance and award it the higher mark just because Kate Mara is simply adorable. Why? Because I can.

0

Shameless: 2011 TV pilot

shameless-01

Shameless is more about family than poverty. Yes, the Gallaghers are dirt poor, and ‘joe-jobs’ might be putting it kindly for a family paying bills with disability cheques and contributions from the church collection plate. But if Shameless works – and it does – then it’s because it’s not really about those things. In recognising that poor is no fun for anyone, it focuses instead on a family being down and out, but pretty fucking okay with it. The original British show may have passed me by, but having initially struggled to recognise the Americanised Office as simply a different kind of show, I wonder if it doesn’t hurt to come to a remake without expectation. After all, if I wanted that other show, I’d be watching it.

The US pilot has a prevailing sense of anarchy that belies the slick precision underpinning the chaos. For a show about a rabble it feels remarkably professional, but not in a bad way: it just seems like good TV. Pilots often struggle with the demands of outlining a premise and reams of backstory, while telling a story gripping enough to sell the show. How do you introduce these new characters and avoid the dreaded moment when they must clumsily refer to one another by their full name? Shameless might be helped by Showtime’s generous one hour slots, but there’s more to it than that. They drop you into a world already on the move, with the players jostling for position at the breakfast table. We observe a well-oiled machine that first sends the electric bill round for everyone to throw in a buck, then follows it with gulped-down cereal and the kids being harried out the door, past the dryer propped closed with a rickety chair. 5 minutes in and already you’re exhausted.

Surprisingly, the principal character here isn’t William H Macy’s Frank who, as a drunken father of six, is more the drunk than the father. Creator Paul Abbott wrote both this and the original, so assumingly it’s a faithful translation, but the action instead focuses on Fiona (Emmy Rossum). With mum nowhere to be seen and Dad somewhere in the gutter, everyone looks to her for direction, and if you’re tempted to think she’s just the best of a bad bunch then you’re missing her potential. Handsome Steve isn’t, but then he’s not from around here. He drives a BMW for crying out loud; I’m surprised he even drives through the Projects, let alone parks there. But there he is, him and Fiona having the kind of animal sex that only ever happens on screen: food gets upturned and plates crash helplessly to the floor as the kitchen is broken apart in the interests of carnal relations.

I’d be thinking about a morning hangover spent cleaning all that up, but I suppose that’s why I’m not having sex like in the movies.

Yes, that’s the reason.

They’re interrupted by the police knocking at the door, dragging Frank home from a night out. They’re all on first name terms, so you guess this isn’t the first time Frank has been unceremoniously set down by the kitchen cabinet. “I wouldn’t put him near a carpet until his pants dry out a bit” shrugs the officer. He’s pushing 50 and on disability, living a world away from the kind of upward social mobility the government likes to crow about. If there’s such a thing as ‘responsibility’ and ‘duty’, then Frank’s responsibility is to drink himself into trouble, and your duty to get him home without anyone finding out he’s scamming Social Security. There’s a lot of bumbling, not a lot of fighting; he’s a happy drunk really, and hey: the bills get paid. Not by him, but they do.

The biggest revelation about Shameless is that it dares to defy convention. There’s a tendency for dramas like this to render the characters angry, two-dimensional hick stereotypes; ‘My Name Is Earl’ was particularly guilty of it. But the Gallaghers are a family that share an odd affection for one another. Take the two eldest brothers: we join Lip as his neighbour goes down on him during one of their regular tutoring sessions, the revelation of calculus as an aphrodisiac a surprise to him and everyone else. When he begins to suspect his brother might be gay (the stash of butch wank-mags give it away even if being a weekend Paratrooper doesn’t), what does he do? He takes Ian along to that neighbour and she gets right to it, as if it were all totally normal. “Like playing pool with a rope” she offers as evidence of his emerging sexuality. Other shows might have angled into an expose on family intolerance, but Shameless proves itself better than that, with Lip emerges with a strange kind of sweetness that I found touching. I wasn’t expecting that.

The problem is, you might; you were there the first time around. What’s going to be your reaction to ragtag Americans impersonating characters you’ve grown to love? I can’t answer that for you, but let me offer this: this is no Coupling or Spaced. It’s not The Thick Of It. Shameless isn’t another in a line of remade and aborted shows that exist only to remind us lightning can’t easily be re-captured. There are no faked Manc accents, no awkward British colloquialisms. West Wing fans will find doubting the motivations of producer John Wells easy enough, but his vision of Shameless is humourous and spiky, and it doesn’t root around in its filth nearly as much as you fear. I’m yet to be convinced that Macy, for all his mastery, is the right man for the role of Frank – he all too often plays to the back-row when dialling it down would be more effective – but the strength surrounding him has me open to being convinced.

Whatever your take on the merits of translating shows like this to an American audience, Shameless is good on its own merits. If it captures the essence of the original then all the better, but this version – like The Office before it – has all the ingredients for something new and, dare I say it, better.

0

Episodes pilot

episodes-01

If leaving a big show is a road paved with good intentions, then Matt LeBlanc’s career is surely the Highway of Death out of Kuwait. The spectre of Friends looms large even now, some 7 years after it came to an end, and his pitch for a Kelsey Grammer career in spinoff ‘Joey’ failed to find a by-then weary audience. To add insult to injury, his movie career was over before it began, watching helplessly as 1998′s Lost in Space received a critical panning so universal that he might well have wished he’d… well, the jokes write themselves.

Billed as something of a critical revival for LeBlanc, Showtime’s ‘Episodes’ premiered last week and, as his first acting venture in a number of years, is a valiant attempt to distance himself from the Tribbiani brand he’s become so completely synonymous with. The premise is certainly a promising one, structured around a British writing duos attempts to recreate their show in America. Though its setup allows him a degree of humility in sending himself up for the sake of a good script, what will have more immediately struck LeBlanc is the conspicuous absence of a laughter track to lean on; a concession to the prevailing wind of almost all high-end comedy since HBO’s Curb Your Enthusiasm. A brave step away from the world of Friends it might be, but having seen the end product one wonders whether there actually *was* a studio audience present, just not one that found any of it very funny; for a comedy, it’s scarily plausible.

The writers – both in real life and on the show – are Tamsin Greig and Stephen Mangan, who you might remember from Channel 4′s clever Green Wing. Together, they’ve gone about as far as you can in British comedy without climbing the ego scaffolding of Ricky Gervais, and so this trip across the pond seems the natural next step. Mangan is cast as the buffoonish Sean Lincoln, a genial enough type who finds himself lurching from one inconsequential faux pas to another without a trace of mean-spirited intentionality. In contrast, on-screen wife Beverley (Greig) is immediately revealed as the unlikeliest comedy writer this side of Rob Schneider, by virtue of being profoundly and relentlessly unfunny. As seems to be typical for TV, she comes across as a nagging harridan wherever possible, and if it’s an act designed to elicit sympathy for the terminally brow-beaten Sean, then it does so at the cost of turning a central pillar of the show into an unintentional hate-figure.

Perhaps understandably, much of the show’s press coverage has focused on LeBlanc, but he remains a resolutely low-key figure during the opening episodes, trading in his former goofball routine for a much straighter performance, albeit one complete with “Hey hey, look at me” nudges to the audience. The focus is instead on the Lincoln’s dealings with the network, primarily their growing realisation that the wooing received back home doesn’t necessarily translate to even cooperation stateside. Kathleen Rose Perkin is amusing enough as the couple’s smiley-happy agent, but what little fun there is in John Pankow’s condescending stint as network president is overshadowed by an Alec Baldwin who, in so completely corning the market in smiling-obliviousness, reveals characters such as his to be little more than uninspired pastiche.

More successful are the facial tics of Morning Randolph (Mircea Monroe), who doesn’t so much indicate displeasure as physically groan with her entire face, feigning an American drawl that wonderfully straddles the line between being demeaning and simply dumbfounded. Richard Grittiths is an equal delight as Julian Bullard in the guise of an aging British actor, whose appearance as an auditionee that will delight those who, like me, assumed he was dead; the back-and-forth as he tries to win over a bemused and reticent panel is a colourful delight in an otherwise dull palette.

The tone of the show is very much one of a warmed over Curb Your Enthusiasm, and while it superficially shares many of the trappings that propelled Larry David’s comedy to critical acclaim, in practice it’s more akin to something a modern-day Jerry Seinfeld would get involved with. The pacing is best likened to an amputee fishing for rusks in a bucket of lard, and the script is almost entirely without humour, situational or otherwise: brief moments of cute observation are overshadowed by running ‘jokes’ that seemingly peak with Sean and Beverley’s home security guard, who we’re hilariously reminded on at least three occasions can’t remember the new arrivals and must blindly ask who they’re here to see. It barely registers as an amusing diversion the first time, but by the third iteration you come to realise that it’s not so much a setup as an actual punchline.

Episodes mostly refrains from leaning on lazy cultural stereotypes (“Americans just don’t get irony” [smug Briton]), and the writers are wise to resist the temptation to have LeBlanc play another vacuous Joey-clone: he’s pitched instead as a regular guy who has just enough self-awareness to know he’s wrong for the part he’s been put forward for, and isn’t above sharing a few ‘I know, I know’ shrugs with the equally swept-up-by-momentum Lincolns. Yet much as I can see why creator David Crane found the premise an appealing departure from his 90s work, glimmers of life are far too thinly spread to save a show so thoroughly beaten to the punch by 8 years or more. With Curb Your Enthusiasm coming off what many consider to be its strongest year, and other network comedies breaking new ground elsewhere, the only conclusion to draw from Episodes is of a show that has scant reason to exist at all, no matter how much LeBlanc might need it to.