Flushed down the toilet, bagged and left for disposal; these are the fates that wait for us all, the possessions that once marked our lives seen finally as impositions to be packed away in dusty boxes marked – if we are lucky – ‘Dad’. “You’ll be able to go home” …
30 Minutes or Less
Posted on December 15, 2011 by Paul
A pizza boy’s lot is not a happy one. No sooner are you out of pocket over some impossible delivery promise, than you wind up having two hillbillies strap a homemade bomb to your chest. A burgeoning career built on a house of tics, poor Jesse Eisenberg has never looked quite so ill-at-ease.
The filmmakers might claim otherwise, but 30 Minutes or Less is a ripped-from-the-headlines tale of extortion in middle America. In 2003, Brian Douglas Wells walked into a Pennsylvania bank and demanded $250,000 in cash. When the police moved to apprehend him, his bomb-vest exploded. Strange enough on its own, Wells’ death only grows more bizarre upon hearing the finer details: how a prostitute lured him into an elaborate plot to kill an accomplice’s father and secure his sizeable inheritance. How Wells sat for fittings of the bomb, believing it to be a fake right up until it blew a hole in his chest.
That plot is reproduced with few noteworthy changes. The prostitute is now a stripper, and Eisenberg’s burdened protagonist is less the stiffed abettor than a sad-sack playing fetch. Otherwise, the changes are strictly tonal – it being hard to imagine the real conspirators excusing their actions through a succinct citation of fatalism. “Sometimes,” Dwayne (Danny McBride) reflects, his shorn perm blowing in the breeze, “fate pulls out its big old cock and slaps you right in the face”.
10 hours in an explosives vest spells trouble. Under the constant watch of bumpkin duo Dwayne and Travis, Nick Flanning sets about finding himself a partner in crime. Lifelong friend – loosely speaking – Chet is teaching a high school class when Nick shows up sporting a pregnant overcoat. Aghast, he speaks for the audience. “Your first thought was to come to a school, filled with young children?”. Nick scrunches up his beetroot features and crumbles into an arms-aloft panic, while Chet considers the possibilities. Dismissing an early suggestion to simply remove the patient’s arms as impractical, he turns instead to the wisdom of the crowd. “All these web sites have different shit. There’s not a lot of consensus in the bomb-disarming community. What did they do in the Hurt Locker?”
Suffice to say, it didn’t involve holding up a bank with toy guns, fake names, and absurd pleasantries, but that’s 30 Minutes for you. Its unmistakable star is Aziz Ansari. Appearing opposite an easily flustered co-star affords him the opportunity to revive that Parks and Recreation swagger, liberally deployed in scenes that mesh seamlessly with a style once described as ‘the Kayne West of local government’. He brings a truckload of enthusiasm to a spirited caper which, critically, seems like it was as fun to film as it is to watch. Eisenberg’s nervous energy makes for a perfect foil, and the pair romp from rooftop declarations through to a tick-tock finale with nary a breath between.
At that pace, something was always going to give; how unfortunate it had to be the ending. What amounts to a teenage rendition of Crank is puffed past bursting point by a clumsily manufactured third-act that sees the story swerving down another, almost fatal, avenue. The sudden appearance of a hitherto unseen character is not only a sure sign of a story that lacks planning, but evidence of terrible judgement. When you have pairings as great as Eisenberg/Ansari and McBride/Swardson, the last thing you need is to switch focus to a gummy stereotype both squeaky and nonsensical. His appearance heralds the passing of a streamlined fun machine, and the arrival of stumbling gun-porn. I get that these kids are supposed to have spent their extended adolescence absorbing the wisdom of Nakatomi Plaza, but their transformation into actual – if self-effacing – John McClane figures is, dare I say, unrealistic.
Everything before that is still an effective mix of the gun-for-hire and hostage genres, with pace and style the match of any of its pleasantly deranged contemporaries. It ends up in a bad place, but, even there, Anzari saves the day.
Beautiful Boy
Posted on November 27, 2011 by Paul
Michael Sheen and Maria Bello give brave performances as a married couple trying to come to terms with the quite incomprehensible. They shared a family home, yet found words increasingly hard to come by. Every strained dinner conversation was another reminder of the extent to which they’d used their son as a panacea; once hoping that a life of recitals and college tuition might somehow bridge the void. Now they seemed more like middle-aged strangers than partners, bound by a child they barely heard from. Vacations first postponed, then cancelled. Messages left were seldom returned, and even those that were took the form of vacuous pleasantries. Family, like marriage, becomes just another routine when you stop asking anything of one another, and how sad it is that it took their son killing himself and his classmates to remind them of that.
Films can be so focused on the event that they forget to consider what happens afterwards. Beautiful Boy exists almost entirely in that forgotten space, so much so that our only glimpses of the son are in a phone call on the eve of his death. Had his parents thought to truly listen, they might have sensed his growing preoccupation. They did not; there would always be tomorrow. Bill (Sheen) cut him short in favour of the evening paper, just as his mother (Bello) could think only to remind him to study hard and stay in school. Such words, imparting neither love nor warmth, are unlikely to have been those she’d have chosen with prescience, but then life always did have a way with irony.
By choosing to look beyond their tortured son, the film imagines instead what two perfect strangers might do when faced with the truth. Within minutes of the police making the announcement, a sea of reporters and cameras arrived to camp out on their lawn. The couple hide upstairs in the darkness of their son’s bedroom, finding stories and artefacts, but few explanations. How could they? Senseless acts are both more than the sum of their parts and, inversely, nothing at all. As parents, it must have been maddening to try and reason with that, no less so for it having been committed by a child they must now accept they hardly even knew.
Before long, they go to stay with Kate’s brother, who has a young family of his own and accommodates them as best he can. Bill quickly retreats to the comforting routines of work, only to find his presence there drawing the stares of co-workers who mistake judgement for concern. His wife, increasingly adrift, grows dependant on mothering her nephew. The fairytales that once delighted her own son are now gifted to him, in bedtime rituals that try to make sense of where she might have gone wrong. Late one night, as they dissect their roles, the hand-held camera draws in closer. Bill snaps. “I wish to god we hadn’t had him” he rages, throwing his wife to the floor. “I wish we hadn’t fucking had him”.
There are brief moments of relief. The couple break into unbridled laughter in a dinky motel room, meeting over cheap vending-machine snacks that kindle some forgotten passion. In all other respects, this remains a bleak and understated film, as arguably it must. There’s always the risk that drawing too much drama from a tragedy can leave it a silly artifice of grief, and Shawn Ku directs accordingly, with caution that leans on silence over words. Just about everything he wishes to convey can be found in the motionless prayers of a father, or a wife’s resentment that seems to extinguish all hope of redemption. To lose a child is to ask questions that cannot hope to yield answers, and Beautiful Boy must content itself with documenting the cogs’ futile spin.
Snowtown
Posted on November 27, 2011 by Paul
Between 1992 and 1999, a small Adelaide community were witness to a series of gruesome murders. Of the eleven people that died, eight were discovered in barrels, with the remaining three buried in shallow graves. Some of the victims were child molesters, while others committed crimes no more heinous than to be gay or, in one instance, merely handicapped. The events that led to their deaths are a lesson not just in the horrors of unchecked ideologies, but in how such horrors can find willing accomplices in desperate communities.
Jamie Vlassakis was a thoughtful young man when he was stripped and photographed by a neighbour, and no less so the day a family friend raped him on the living room floor. The camera observes these moments with little interest, the lone sound of the test match commentary on TV a signal that such brutality has somehow become normalised. It watches, too, the insidious arrival of John Bunting, whom we recognise now as one of Australia’s most depraved serial killers, but who seemed then if not exactly charismatic, then at least conducive to a greater good.
The ease with which Bunting emerged as a community leader is frightening in its verity. He was undoubtedly a child of history; all too aware of the power that comes from a commanding voice in bleak times. As depicted, he would call impromptu kitchen meetings for friends and neighbours, using the occasions to exploit an undercurrent of fear – fear that Snowtown was awash with paedophiles; fear the police were powerless to intervene. Manners and grace saw him quickly ingratiate himself with the Vlassakis family, whose eldest son he saw as possessing an enduring and particularly malleable innocence. It was Bunting himself who insisted Jamie sit in on his first meeting, in which he was encouraged to echo back the vitriol of the group. Later, he would faithfully execute Bunting’s own dog.
Here is a movie that takes an unflinching approach to barbarism. Cathartic revenge – the pair dumping rotting offal on the porch of a local voyeur – eventually gives way to a more brutal form of vigilantism, so aggressively unpleasant that at times I felt moved to step away. That isn’t something that could ever be said for the cartoon violence of The Human Centipede, a film that doesn’t even begin to equivocate with Bunting savagely torturing a man in a blood-smeared bathroom, only to repeatedly back off so as to extend his own pleasure. It is one of the most indescribably horrific scenes to be committed to film, made all the more unpalatable by Daniel Henshall’s intense, focused performance, and his depiction of a living, breathing monster.
The sad truth of Snowtown is that for every inhuman act, ordinary people stood quietly in support. Bunting and his associates may have acting out their fantasies alone, but they were not so when it came time to vilify the so-called ‘undesirables’ of the community, nor when Bunting advocated their executions to a baying crowd. More frightening still is that he was happy – and able – to confound genuine menace with his own misguided bigotry, coaching the bile in a language that will be familiar to anyone who has had the misfortune to observe a modern-day political lynch mob.
The enemy of my enemy is not a friend, and to watch Jamie, then just 16-years-old, being pulled into that world is to experience a profound sense of helplessness. The brave, the incendiary, the innocuous John Bunting was a Trojan horse for evil unbound, destroying a young life for little more than sadism and vengeful infamy.
Twitter Updates
- RT @Slate: A wonderful letter Ronald Reagan sent to his son before his wedding: http://t.co/rxRoBfn6 via @LettersOfNote 4 days ago
- @laurenlaverne Not only do you schedule your show, but Breaking Bad hasn't been 'cancelled' so much as simply ending next year #sortofbetter 5 days ago
- Fun series from @rookiemag Ask a grown man: Jon Hamm http://t.co/7f8drQiE , BJ Novak http://t.co/5xw4ZLDr & Paul Rudd http://t.co/lx2zkbrZ 5 days ago
Categories
Submarine: Film of the Year 2011
Posted on December 9, 2011
In the largely subjective realm of film criticism, there can be few more useful barometers of quality than whether you were moved to again return to a film once your review had been filed. The process by which a critic arrives at their film of the year may be a …
Trespass
Posted on November 29, 2011
Kyle Miller lives in what I imagine was once an Art Deco installation, and does so while looking intriguingly like a cleaned-up Raoul Duke. Even for one of Nicolas Cage’s latter-day exercises in expressionism, that makes for a strange combination. His place in this far-fetched siege drama is to appear …
Waiting for Forever
Posted on May 11, 2011
Will Donner describes life as “starting out with goodness so pure and clear you won’t even know it’s there, because that’s the way it is when you don’t know anything”. The same could be said of cinema: limitless possibility projected out into the theatre before a film becomes what it …
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Copyright 2012 Call Me Shallow - All Rights Reserved
Site Design by: Press75.com | Powered by: WordPress



