Flushed down the toilet, bagged and left for disposal; these are the fates that wait for us all, the possessions that once marked our lives seen finally as impositions to be packed away in dusty boxes marked – if we are lucky – ‘Dad’. “You’ll be able to go home” …
Friends with Benefits: 2011 TV
Posted on August 16, 2011 by Paul
Impossibly rich and attractive twenty-somethings spend time in front of the mirror in NBC’s summer comedy, Friends with Benefits.
Impossibly rich and attractive thirty-somethings spend time in front of the mirror in NBC’s soon-to-be-cancelled programme, Friends with Benefits.
One of these is not like the other, which is odd, given that Friends With Benefits is exactly like a lot of other shows – Mad Love and Perfect Couples, for instance; Happy Endings over on ABC is practically identical. Although that one has yet to join the others in the great TV departure lounge, they all share a theme of attractive mannequins hitting up interchangeable city bars, lamenting their perpetual singledom over drinks and one-night stands with [vulnerable/psychotic/stranger/ex], capped by a pledge never to do it again.
They also share two problems: one, they’re not funny. Two, their characters aren’t characters at all.
Billed as comedies, you can imagine why the first might seem a rather insurmountable flaw. Well, here’s a secret: a whole bunch of terminally unfunny shows get by just fine on the basis of otherwise likable characters: CBS’ How I Met Your Mother is one, now coming on for seven years of laugh-track, four camera comedy. What you can’t do, however, is pair those kinds of scripts with leaden placeholders. That kind of thinking leads to shows like Friends With Benefits, in which struggling models are plucked from waitressing gigs in the valley to appear in front of the camera in the hopes they’ll fly.
Unsurprisingly, they do not. Casting the vacuous and the nondescript is rarely a recipe for memorable television, and after four episodes I began to realise not only could I not pick a single one of the cast from a line-up, but that I didn’t even know their names. Whatever failings you might ascribe to How I Met Your Mother, it at least has characters who resemble people you might have encountered, or even know. A certain level of attractiveness is a given – you don’t get very far in TV without it – but they still give off an air of attainability, somehow; we relate to the minutiae. Beneath an inherent glamour lies a group who call a dusty tavern home, in the same way the cast of Friends once did Central Perk. To cite that once lamented symbol of America’s failed democracy, they’re people I’d want to have a beer with. That’s an important quality in choosing a sitcom to commit to.
If it recognises such a truism, then Benefits chooses to ignore it. Consider that one of the leads, Aaron, is a self-made millionaire who lives in a luxurious penthouse. One of his friends is a chiselled jock we faintly remember as the second-worst part of Veronica Mars. His friends come in the more pedestrian guise of nurses and bartenders, and even they’re so distanced from the realities of their profession that they may as well occupy a different trade entirely. Even more telling is the realisation that when these people come together, they do so with no sense of community or bond. For all their supposed in-jokes that hint to shared experiences, there wasn’t a single moment in which I truly believed any of them could be friends.
The pilot submits to its creaking formula by assigning roles early on. Ben and Sara are established as the titular friends in the very first scene. Aaron is the hopeless optimist, and Riley and Julian are… the other two, whose idle commentary is in keeping with superfluous characters everywhere. Ben and Sara casually sleep together, convinced that it doesn’t mean anything when everyone around them knows it does. Sometimes their friends join them in the merry-go-round and sleep with one other, and sometimes they don’t. Later episodes see them exploring party drugs in the naive manner of every programme not on Showtime, followed by mirror-based indulgences and desperate fawning over a series of increasingly dull, handsome dates. Invariably, such adventures will land them right back where started, just a little bit wiser for the experience. And hey, there’s even a narrator to underline their profound spiritual growth.
Friends With Benefits can hardly be called an absolute failure, since its very sterilty precludes any such catastrophic misstep. But in a decade that saw the nurturing of some of the finest shows TV has to offer, is this really the best we can hope for? These writers didn’t fight their way into television just to spend their days rehashing reasons for anonymous, airbrushed characters to have inconsequential sex in soft-focus settings. The pandering isn’t even going to be successful: forgetting all the other networks for a moment, NBC is home to not only the infinitely superior ‘Community’ and ‘Parks and Recreation’, but a whole host of more directly competing shows that in a saner world would have precluded this from even being commissioned.
No matter. Failure is all relative when cancellation just means replacement by an identical show. ABC’s Work It. CBS’ 2 Broke Girls. Fox’s New Girl. NBC’s Witney. Take your pick between a rock and a hard place, loyal viewers, because either way the executive producers are gonna get paid.
Shameless: 2011 TV pilot
Posted on January 20, 2011 by Paul
Shameless is more about family than poverty. Yes, the Gallaghers are dirt poor, and ‘joe-jobs’ might be putting it kindly for a family paying bills with disability cheques and contributions from the church collection plate. But if Shameless works – and it does – then it’s because it’s not really about those things. In recognising that poor is no fun for anyone, it focuses instead on a family being down and out, but pretty fucking okay with it. The original British show may have passed me by, but having initially struggled to recognise the Americanised Office as simply a different kind of show, I wonder if it doesn’t hurt to come to a remake without expectation. After all, if I wanted that other show, I’d be watching it.
The US pilot has a prevailing sense of anarchy that belies the slick precision underpinning the chaos. For a show about a rabble it feels remarkably professional, but not in a bad way: it just seems like good TV. Pilots often struggle with the demands of outlining a premise and reams of backstory, while telling a story gripping enough to sell the show. How do you introduce these new characters and avoid the dreaded moment when they must clumsily refer to one another by their full name? Shameless might be helped by Showtime’s generous one hour slots, but there’s more to it than that. They drop you into a world already on the move, with the players jostling for position at the breakfast table. We observe a well-oiled machine that first sends the electric bill round for everyone to throw in a buck, then follows it with gulped-down cereal and the kids being harried out the door, past the dryer propped closed with a rickety chair. 5 minutes in and already you’re exhausted.
Surprisingly, the principal character here isn’t William H Macy’s Frank who, as a drunken father of six, is more the drunk than the father. Creator Paul Abbott wrote both this and the original, so assumingly it’s a faithful translation, but the action instead focuses on Fiona (Emmy Rossum). With mum nowhere to be seen and Dad somewhere in the gutter, everyone looks to her for direction, and if you’re tempted to think she’s just the best of a bad bunch then you’re missing her potential. Handsome Steve isn’t, but then he’s not from around here. He drives a BMW for crying out loud; I’m surprised he even drives through the Projects, let alone parks there. But there he is, him and Fiona having the kind of animal sex that only ever happens on screen: food gets upturned and plates crash helplessly to the floor as the kitchen is broken apart in the interests of carnal relations.
I’d be thinking about a morning hangover spent cleaning all that up, but I suppose that’s why I’m not having sex like in the movies.
Yes, that’s the reason.
They’re interrupted by the police knocking at the door, dragging Frank home from a night out. They’re all on first name terms, so you guess this isn’t the first time Frank has been unceremoniously set down by the kitchen cabinet. “I wouldn’t put him near a carpet until his pants dry out a bit” shrugs the officer. He’s pushing 50 and on disability, living a world away from the kind of upward social mobility the government likes to crow about. If there’s such a thing as ‘responsibility’ and ‘duty’, then Frank’s responsibility is to drink himself into trouble, and your duty to get him home without anyone finding out he’s scamming Social Security. There’s a lot of bumbling, not a lot of fighting; he’s a happy drunk really, and hey: the bills get paid. Not by him, but they do.
The biggest revelation about Shameless is that it dares to defy convention. There’s a tendency for dramas like this to render the characters angry, two-dimensional hick stereotypes; ‘My Name Is Earl’ was particularly guilty of it. But the Gallaghers are a family that share an odd affection for one another. Take the two eldest brothers: we join Lip as his neighbour goes down on him during one of their regular tutoring sessions, the revelation of calculus as an aphrodisiac a surprise to him and everyone else. When he begins to suspect his brother might be gay (the stash of butch wank-mags give it away even if being a weekend Paratrooper doesn’t), what does he do? He takes Ian along to that neighbour and she gets right to it, as if it were all totally normal. “Like playing pool with a rope” she offers as evidence of his emerging sexuality. Other shows might have angled into an expose on family intolerance, but Shameless proves itself better than that, with Lip emerges with a strange kind of sweetness that I found touching. I wasn’t expecting that.
The problem is, you might; you were there the first time around. What’s going to be your reaction to ragtag Americans impersonating characters you’ve grown to love? I can’t answer that for you, but let me offer this: this is no Coupling or Spaced. It’s not The Thick Of It. Shameless isn’t another in a line of remade and aborted shows that exist only to remind us lightning can’t easily be re-captured. There are no faked Manc accents, no awkward British colloquialisms. West Wing fans will find doubting the motivations of producer John Wells easy enough, but his vision of Shameless is humourous and spiky, and it doesn’t root around in its filth nearly as much as you fear. I’m yet to be convinced that Macy, for all his mastery, is the right man for the role of Frank – he all too often plays to the back-row when dialling it down would be more effective – but the strength surrounding him has me open to being convinced.
Whatever your take on the merits of translating shows like this to an American audience, Shameless is good on its own merits. If it captures the essence of the original then all the better, but this version – like The Office before it – has all the ingredients for something new and, dare I say it, better.
Episodes pilot
Posted on January 20, 2011 by Paul
If leaving a big show is a road paved with good intentions, then Matt LeBlanc’s career is surely the Highway of Death out of Kuwait. The spectre of Friends looms large even now, some 7 years after it came to an end, and his pitch for a Kelsey Grammer career in spinoff ‘Joey’ failed to find a by-then weary audience. To add insult to injury, his movie career was over before it began, watching helplessly as 1998′s Lost in Space received a critical panning so universal that he might well have wished he’d… well, the jokes write themselves.
Billed as something of a critical revival for LeBlanc, Showtime’s ‘Episodes’ premiered last week and, as his first acting venture in a number of years, is a valiant attempt to distance himself from the Tribbiani brand he’s become so completely synonymous with. The premise is certainly a promising one, structured around a British writing duos attempts to recreate their show in America. Though its setup allows him a degree of humility in sending himself up for the sake of a good script, what will have more immediately struck LeBlanc is the conspicuous absence of a laughter track to lean on; a concession to the prevailing wind of almost all high-end comedy since HBO’s Curb Your Enthusiasm. A brave step away from the world of Friends it might be, but having seen the end product one wonders whether there actually *was* a studio audience present, just not one that found any of it very funny; for a comedy, it’s scarily plausible.
The writers – both in real life and on the show – are Tamsin Greig and Stephen Mangan, who you might remember from Channel 4′s clever Green Wing. Together, they’ve gone about as far as you can in British comedy without climbing the ego scaffolding of Ricky Gervais, and so this trip across the pond seems the natural next step. Mangan is cast as the buffoonish Sean Lincoln, a genial enough type who finds himself lurching from one inconsequential faux pas to another without a trace of mean-spirited intentionality. In contrast, on-screen wife Beverley (Greig) is immediately revealed as the unlikeliest comedy writer this side of Rob Schneider, by virtue of being profoundly and relentlessly unfunny. As seems to be typical for TV, she comes across as a nagging harridan wherever possible, and if it’s an act designed to elicit sympathy for the terminally brow-beaten Sean, then it does so at the cost of turning a central pillar of the show into an unintentional hate-figure.
Perhaps understandably, much of the show’s press coverage has focused on LeBlanc, but he remains a resolutely low-key figure during the opening episodes, trading in his former goofball routine for a much straighter performance, albeit one complete with “Hey hey, look at me” nudges to the audience. The focus is instead on the Lincoln’s dealings with the network, primarily their growing realisation that the wooing received back home doesn’t necessarily translate to even cooperation stateside. Kathleen Rose Perkin is amusing enough as the couple’s smiley-happy agent, but what little fun there is in John Pankow’s condescending stint as network president is overshadowed by an Alec Baldwin who, in so completely corning the market in smiling-obliviousness, reveals characters such as his to be little more than uninspired pastiche.
More successful are the facial tics of Morning Randolph (Mircea Monroe), who doesn’t so much indicate displeasure as physically groan with her entire face, feigning an American drawl that wonderfully straddles the line between being demeaning and simply dumbfounded. Richard Grittiths is an equal delight as Julian Bullard in the guise of an aging British actor, whose appearance as an auditionee that will delight those who, like me, assumed he was dead; the back-and-forth as he tries to win over a bemused and reticent panel is a colourful delight in an otherwise dull palette.
The tone of the show is very much one of a warmed over Curb Your Enthusiasm, and while it superficially shares many of the trappings that propelled Larry David’s comedy to critical acclaim, in practice it’s more akin to something a modern-day Jerry Seinfeld would get involved with. The pacing is best likened to an amputee fishing for rusks in a bucket of lard, and the script is almost entirely without humour, situational or otherwise: brief moments of cute observation are overshadowed by running ‘jokes’ that seemingly peak with Sean and Beverley’s home security guard, who we’re hilariously reminded on at least three occasions can’t remember the new arrivals and must blindly ask who they’re here to see. It barely registers as an amusing diversion the first time, but by the third iteration you come to realise that it’s not so much a setup as an actual punchline.
Episodes mostly refrains from leaning on lazy cultural stereotypes (“Americans just don’t get irony” [smug Briton]), and the writers are wise to resist the temptation to have LeBlanc play another vacuous Joey-clone: he’s pitched instead as a regular guy who has just enough self-awareness to know he’s wrong for the part he’s been put forward for, and isn’t above sharing a few ‘I know, I know’ shrugs with the equally swept-up-by-momentum Lincolns. Yet much as I can see why creator David Crane found the premise an appealing departure from his 90s work, glimmers of life are far too thinly spread to save a show so thoroughly beaten to the punch by 8 years or more. With Curb Your Enthusiasm coming off what many consider to be its strongest year, and other network comedies breaking new ground elsewhere, the only conclusion to draw from Episodes is of a show that has scant reason to exist at all, no matter how much LeBlanc might need it to.
Twitter Updates
- @EmmaSimmonds The whole movie just seems to drifts by without consequence, really. Such a shame. 1 day ago
- @EmmaSimmonds Good review but 'sketched in' is putting it mildly! Despite the performance, even Dave's spiral is without notable event. 1 day ago
- @AbKi Is that a better or worse present than 2 Crompton daylight bulbs? 2 days ago
Categories
Submarine: Film of the Year 2011
Posted on December 9, 2011
In the largely subjective realm of film criticism, there can be few more useful barometers of quality than whether you were moved to again return to a film once your review had been filed. The process by which a critic arrives at their film of the year may be a …
Trespass
Posted on November 29, 2011
Kyle Miller lives in what I imagine was once an Art Deco installation, and does so while looking intriguingly like a cleaned-up Raoul Duke. Even for one of Nicolas Cage’s latter-day exercises in expressionism, that makes for a strange combination. His place in this far-fetched siege drama is to appear …
Waiting for Forever
Posted on May 11, 2011
Will Donner describes life as “starting out with goodness so pure and clear you won’t even know it’s there, because that’s the way it is when you don’t know anything”. The same could be said of cinema: limitless possibility projected out into the theatre before a film becomes what it …
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Copyright 2012 Call Me Shallow - All Rights Reserved
Site Design by: Press75.com | Powered by: WordPress



