Flushed down the toilet, bagged and left for disposal; these are the fates that wait for us all, the possessions that once marked our lives seen finally as impositions to be packed away in dusty boxes marked – if we are lucky – ‘Dad’. “You’ll be able to go home” …
Beautiful Boy
Posted on November 27, 2011 by Paul
Michael Sheen and Maria Bello give brave performances as a married couple trying to come to terms with the quite incomprehensible. They shared a family home, yet found words increasingly hard to come by. Every strained dinner conversation was another reminder of the extent to which they’d used their son as a panacea; once hoping that a life of recitals and college tuition might somehow bridge the void. Now they seemed more like middle-aged strangers than partners, bound by a child they barely heard from. Vacations first postponed, then cancelled. Messages left were seldom returned, and even those that were took the form of vacuous pleasantries. Family, like marriage, becomes just another routine when you stop asking anything of one another, and how sad it is that it took their son killing himself and his classmates to remind them of that.
Films can be so focused on the event that they forget to consider what happens afterwards. Beautiful Boy exists almost entirely in that forgotten space, so much so that our only glimpses of the son are in a phone call on the eve of his death. Had his parents thought to truly listen, they might have sensed his growing preoccupation. They did not; there would always be tomorrow. Bill (Sheen) cut him short in favour of the evening paper, just as his mother (Bello) could think only to remind him to study hard and stay in school. Such words, imparting neither love nor warmth, are unlikely to have been those she’d have chosen with prescience, but then life always did have a way with irony.
By choosing to look beyond their tortured son, the film imagines instead what two perfect strangers might do when faced with the truth. Within minutes of the police making the announcement, a sea of reporters and cameras arrived to camp out on their lawn. The couple hide upstairs in the darkness of their son’s bedroom, finding stories and artefacts, but few explanations. How could they? Senseless acts are both more than the sum of their parts and, inversely, nothing at all. As parents, it must have been maddening to try and reason with that, no less so for it having been committed by a child they must now accept they hardly even knew.
Before long, they go to stay with Kate’s brother, who has a young family of his own and accommodates them as best he can. Bill quickly retreats to the comforting routines of work, only to find his presence there drawing the stares of co-workers who mistake judgement for concern. His wife, increasingly adrift, grows dependant on mothering her nephew. The fairytales that once delighted her own son are now gifted to him, in bedtime rituals that try to make sense of where she might have gone wrong. Late one night, as they dissect their roles, the hand-held camera draws in closer. Bill snaps. “I wish to god we hadn’t had him” he rages, throwing his wife to the floor. “I wish we hadn’t fucking had him”.
There are brief moments of relief. The couple break into unbridled laughter in a dinky motel room, meeting over cheap vending-machine snacks that kindle some forgotten passion. In all other respects, this remains a bleak and understated film, as arguably it must. There’s always the risk that drawing too much drama from a tragedy can leave it a silly artifice of grief, and Shawn Ku directs accordingly, with caution that leans on silence over words. Just about everything he wishes to convey can be found in the motionless prayers of a father, or a wife’s resentment that seems to extinguish all hope of redemption. To lose a child is to ask questions that cannot hope to yield answers, and Beautiful Boy must content itself with documenting the cogs’ futile spin.
Snowtown
Posted on November 27, 2011 by Paul
Between 1992 and 1999, a small Adelaide community were witness to a series of gruesome murders. Of the eleven people that died, eight were discovered in barrels, with the remaining three buried in shallow graves. Some of the victims were child molesters, while others committed crimes no more heinous than to be gay or, in one instance, merely handicapped. The events that led to their deaths are a lesson not just in the horrors of unchecked ideologies, but in how such horrors can find willing accomplices in desperate communities.
Jamie Vlassakis was a thoughtful young man when he was stripped and photographed by a neighbour, and no less so the day a family friend raped him on the living room floor. The camera observes these moments with little interest, the lone sound of the test match commentary on TV a signal that such brutality has somehow become normalised. It watches, too, the insidious arrival of John Bunting, whom we recognise now as one of Australia’s most depraved serial killers, but who seemed then if not exactly charismatic, then at least conducive to a greater good.
The ease with which Bunting emerged as a community leader is frightening in its verity. He was undoubtedly a child of history; all too aware of the power that comes from a commanding voice in bleak times. As depicted, he would call impromptu kitchen meetings for friends and neighbours, using the occasions to exploit an undercurrent of fear – fear that Snowtown was awash with paedophiles; fear the police were powerless to intervene. Manners and grace saw him quickly ingratiate himself with the Vlassakis family, whose eldest son he saw as possessing an enduring and particularly malleable innocence. It was Bunting himself who insisted Jamie sit in on his first meeting, in which he was encouraged to echo back the vitriol of the group. Later, he would faithfully execute Bunting’s own dog.
Here is a movie that takes an unflinching approach to barbarism. Cathartic revenge – the pair dumping rotting offal on the porch of a local voyeur – eventually gives way to a more brutal form of vigilantism, so aggressively unpleasant that at times I felt moved to step away. That isn’t something that could ever be said for the cartoon violence of The Human Centipede, a film that doesn’t even begin to equivocate with Bunting savagely torturing a man in a blood-smeared bathroom, only to repeatedly back off so as to extend his own pleasure. It is one of the most indescribably horrific scenes to be committed to film, made all the more unpalatable by Daniel Henshall’s intense, focused performance, and his depiction of a living, breathing monster.
The sad truth of Snowtown is that for every inhuman act, ordinary people stood quietly in support. Bunting and his associates may have acting out their fantasies alone, but they were not so when it came time to vilify the so-called ‘undesirables’ of the community, nor when Bunting advocated their executions to a baying crowd. More frightening still is that he was happy – and able – to confound genuine menace with his own misguided bigotry, coaching the bile in a language that will be familiar to anyone who has had the misfortune to observe a modern-day political lynch mob.
The enemy of my enemy is not a friend, and to watch Jamie, then just 16-years-old, being pulled into that world is to experience a profound sense of helplessness. The brave, the incendiary, the innocuous John Bunting was a Trojan horse for evil unbound, destroying a young life for little more than sadism and vengeful infamy.
50/50
Posted on November 23, 2011 by Paul
When you’re diagnosed with cancer, you never consider that your shaved head might turn out like Gorbachev’s. Then again, once you hear the word ‘cancer’, everything else has a way of getting tuned out. “It’s a malignant tumour” the doctor might say, to which you’d respond “A tumour?”, like maybe you’d misheard. “Yes” he’d say, a tumour. To this, you’ll turn to look at an otherwise empty consultation room. “Me?” you’ll ask. “Yes” he’ll say, you.
Adam Lerner stares at his oncologist. “That doesn’t make any sense”, and indeed it doesn’t. Cancer rarely does. 50/50 approaches the gloomy spectre with a refreshing flippancy, as if unfazed by the reputation that precedes it. There can’t be much humour in a 27-year-old being handed a coin flip chance at survival, but as a movie about best friends trying to make a go of a bad situation, it’s an appealing rub. Anyway, who wants to spend three maudlin hours exploring what a comedy can do just as well in half the time?
Two buddies and a whole heap of bad luck about sums it up. Adam (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) works for a public radio station with his friend, Kyle (Seth Rogen). A keen runner, a niggling back injury gave Adam little cause to expect anything more than a lecture on proper form. Instead, he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of spinal cancer, to which you might ask: well, is there any other kind? The newly diagnosed all exit into the same state of limbo, in which they are expected to greet a potentially fatal insurgency with patience. While waiting for his treatment to begin, Adam breaks the news to his girlfriend, Rachael, whose expression betrays a young woman not yet ready to care for a sick man. No one signs up for that, least of all a bright, attractive twenty-something. Picture yourself in the same situation, and ask if you could find the strength to pretend otherwise.
As Adam’s mother dutifully fusses and makes plans to move in, Kyle offers something no less profound than more of the same. He gets Adam drunk, high and laid, not because his friend is sick, but because that’s what they’ve always done. It’s rather perceptive of him to recognise that, for all the well-meaning gestures, sometimes all a friend needs to hear is that his shaved head will be a homerun with the ladies. It’s only by consciously ignoring the more accepted modes of sympathy that Seth Rogen is able to surprise us by demonstrating genuine kindness; stoner normalcy in a world falling apart.
Therapist Katherine is new enough to not yet be a doctor, and young enough to miss Adam’s references to Doogie Howser (“Oh, does he work here?”). Nevertheless, their relationship attests to sharp writing that rejects the overwrought emotion of similar scenes in Good Will Hunting. Anna Kendrick follows ‘Up In The Air’ with another attuned performance, whose neuroticism and modesty goes someway to countering the belief that such relationships must always end in romance. The studio pressure to have done so must have been immense, which makes the filmmakers refusal to submit to the wisdom of focus groups an especially laudable one.
50/50 may be slight, but you wouldn’t have it any other way. Despite the subject matter, this is essentially a buddy movie, equal parts endearing, vulgar and insightful; as insightful as you can get about a 27-year-old with cancer, at any rate. Such a thing was never meant for the young, and no film can ever begin to explain cruel, dumb luck. In embracing that, 50/50 is free to explore other, more palatable, possibilities.
Twitter Updates
- @EmmaSimmonds The whole movie just seems to drifts by without consequence, really. Such a shame. 1 day ago
- @EmmaSimmonds Good review but 'sketched in' is putting it mildly! Despite the performance, even Dave's spiral is without notable event. 1 day ago
- @AbKi Is that a better or worse present than 2 Crompton daylight bulbs? 2 days ago
Categories
Submarine: Film of the Year 2011
Posted on December 9, 2011
In the largely subjective realm of film criticism, there can be few more useful barometers of quality than whether you were moved to again return to a film once your review had been filed. The process by which a critic arrives at their film of the year may be a …
Trespass
Posted on November 29, 2011
Kyle Miller lives in what I imagine was once an Art Deco installation, and does so while looking intriguingly like a cleaned-up Raoul Duke. Even for one of Nicolas Cage’s latter-day exercises in expressionism, that makes for a strange combination. His place in this far-fetched siege drama is to appear …
Waiting for Forever
Posted on May 11, 2011
Will Donner describes life as “starting out with goodness so pure and clear you won’t even know it’s there, because that’s the way it is when you don’t know anything”. The same could be said of cinema: limitless possibility projected out into the theatre before a film becomes what it …
Archives
Copyright 2012 Call Me Shallow - All Rights Reserved
Site Design by: Press75.com | Powered by: WordPress



